Ja już spakowany.

Pokaż ukrytą treśći na lotnisku

Jak byłem moderatorem na wykop.pl to myślicie, że mnie uznają za specjalistę i wyślą wezwanie do jednostki?

Nie szanuję słowa dziaders, jest krindżowe i brzmi jakby to Wojewódzki u siebie powiedział jako slang i jakby ludzie wychowani w PRLu myśleli, że to jest dobre słowo na boomerów. Jak ktoś używa to tylko się mi krindż alarm odpala gdzie to słowo ktoś usłyszał, że mu się spodobało i powtarza, bo ja za każdym razem jak je słyszę to jest to bezbek w chuj.

Daily Duotrigordle #282
Guesses: 37/37
0️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣3️⃣ 2️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣6️⃣
2️⃣7️⃣ 3️⃣5️⃣ 3️⃣6️⃣ 2️⃣8️⃣
2️⃣9️⃣ 0️⃣5️⃣ 3️⃣0️⃣ 0️⃣6️⃣
3️⃣7️⃣ 0️⃣9️⃣ 0️⃣8️⃣ 0️⃣7️⃣
1️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣0️⃣ 1️⃣3️⃣ 3️⃣1️⃣
1️⃣4️⃣ 1️⃣5️⃣ 1️⃣6️⃣ 1️⃣7️⃣
1️⃣8️⃣ 3️⃣2️⃣ 3️⃣3️⃣ 1️⃣9️⃣
3️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣0️⃣ 2️⃣1️⃣ 2️⃣2️⃣
https://duotrigordle.com/

Kościółki

W ogóle pisałem o kocyku z grzałką na kabel, i u mnie już ciemno i testuje spanko i spoko fajnie ciepło z łóżka. :3

🎂

Rzecz przez bibułkę a chuja do łapy

@Aleks możemy przejść do rzeczy?

@Aleks w czym rzecz?

Nowe mieszkanko fajny widok ma: https://i.imgur.com/Sa85v8u.jpg

To w Incheon (miasto z "Seulskim" lotniskiem).

Deykuns just want to have fun

Focal point (game theory)
In game theory, a focal point (or Schelling point) is a solution that people tend to choose by default in the absence of communication. The concept was introduced by the American economist Thomas Schelling in his book The Strategy of Conflict (1960).[1] Schelling states that "people can often concert their intentions or expectations with others if each knows that the other is trying to do the same" in a cooperative situation (at page 57), so their action would converge on a focal point which has some kind of prominence compared with the environment. However, the conspicuousness of the focal point depends on time, place and people themselves. It may not be a definite solution.

Schelling's questions

Here is a subset of the questions raised by Schelling to prove the existence of a focal point. [1]

1. Head-tail game: Name "heads" or "tails". If the two players name the same, they win an award, otherwise, they get nothing.
2. Letter order game: Give an order to letters A, B, and C. If the three players give the same order, they win an award, otherwise they get nothing.
3. Split money game: Two players share $100. They first write down their individual claims on a sheet of paper. If their claims add to $100 or less, both of them will get exactly what they claimed, but if the sum is higher than $100 they get nothing.

The results of the informal experiments are

1. For the two players, A and B, in head-tail game. 16 out of 22 A and 15 out of 22 B chose "heads".
2. For the three players, A, B, and C, in letter order game. 9 out of 12 A, 10 out of 12 B, and 14 out of 16 C wrote "ABC".
3. For the players to claim part of the $100. 36 out of 40 chose $50. 2 of the remainder chose $49 and $49.99.

These games suggest that focal points have some saliency. These characteristics make them preferable choices to people. Furthermore, people would assume each other has also noticed the saliency and make the same decision.[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focal_point_(game_theory)

Daily Duotrigordle #280
Guesses: 36/37
3️⃣0️⃣ 3️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣3️⃣ 3️⃣2️⃣
1️⃣4️⃣ 1️⃣5️⃣ 3️⃣3️⃣ 0️⃣7️⃣
1️⃣6️⃣ 3️⃣4️⃣ 0️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣7️⃣
0️⃣4️⃣ 1️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣9️⃣ 0️⃣9️⃣
2️⃣0️⃣ 2️⃣1️⃣ 1️⃣0️⃣ 2️⃣2️⃣
0️⃣5️⃣ 0️⃣6️⃣ 2️⃣3️⃣ 3️⃣6️⃣
2️⃣4️⃣ 2️⃣5️⃣ 2️⃣6️⃣ 1️⃣1️⃣
2️⃣7️⃣ 2️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣2️⃣ 2️⃣9️⃣
https://duotrigordle.com/